Copyright © 2004 The American Society of Human Genetics. All rights reserved.
The American Journal of Human Genetics, Volume 74, Issue 1, 1-10, 1 January 2004
doi:10.1086/380648
Aikaterini Barbouti1, *, Pawel Stankiewicz2, *, Chad Nusbaum5, Christina Cuomo5, April Cook5, Mattias Höglund1, Bertil Johansson1, Anne Hagemeijer6, Sung-Sup Park2, †, Felix Mitelman1, James R. Lupski2, 3, 4 and Thoas Fioretos1,
, 
1 Department of Clinical Genetics, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
2 Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Houston
3 Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston
4 Department of Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston
5 Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research/Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Genome Research, Cambridge, MA
6 Department of Human Genetics, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Address for correspondence and reprints: Dr. Thoas Fioretos, Department of Clinical Genetics, Lund University Hospital, Lund, SE-22185, SwedenAbstract
Although a great deal of information has accumulated regarding the mechanisms underlying constitutional DNA rearrangements associated with inherited disorders, virtually nothing is known about the molecular processes involved in acquired neoplasia-associated chromosomal rearrangements. Isochromosome 17q, or “i(17q),” is one of the most common structural abnormalities observed in human neoplasms. We previously identified a breakpoint cluster region for i(17q) formation in 17p11.2 and hypothesized that genome architectural features could be responsible for this clustering. To address this hypothesis, we precisely mapped the i(17q) breakpoints in 11 patients with different hematologic malignancies and determined the genomic structure of the involved region. Our results reveal a complex genomic architecture in the i(17q) breakpoint cluster region, characterized by large (∼38–49-kb), palindromic, low-copy repeats, strongly suggesting that somatic rearrangements are not random events but rather reflect susceptibilities due to the genomic structure.
| Genome Architecture Catalyzes Nonrecurrent Chromosomal Rearrangements The American Journal of Human Genetics, Volume 72, Issue 5, 1 May 2003, Pages 1101-1116 Paweł Stankiewicz, Christine J. Shaw, Jason D. Dapper, Keiko Wakui, Lisa G. Shaffer, Marjorie Withers, Leah Elizondo, Sung-Sup Park and James R. Lupski Abstract To investigate the potential involvement of genome architecture in nonrecurrent chromosome rearrangements, we analyzed the breakpoints of eight translocations and 18 unusual-sized deletions involving human proximal 17p. Surprisingly, we found that many deletion breakpoints occurred in low-copy repeats (LCRs); 13 were associated with novel large LCR17p structures, and 2 mapped within an LCR sequence (middle SMS-REP) within the Smith-Magenis syndrome (SMS) common deletion. Three translocation breakpoints involving 17p11 were found to be located within the centromeric α-satellite sequence D17Z1, three within a pericentromeric segment, and one at the distal SMS-REP. Remarkably, our analysis reveals that LCRs constitute >23% of the analyzed genome sequence in proximal 17p—an experimental observation two- to fourfold higher than predictions based on virtual analysis of the genome. Our data demonstrate that higher-order genomic architecture involving LCRs plays a significant role not only in recurrent chromosome rearrangements but also in translocations and unusual-sized deletions involving 17p. Abstract | | |
| Meiotic Recombination and Spatial Proximity in the Etiology of the Recurrent t(11;22) The American Journal of Human Genetics, Volume 79, Issue 3, 1 September 2006, Pages 524-538 Terry Ashley, Ann P. Gaeth, Hidehito Inagaki, Allen Seftel, Maimon M. Cohen, Lorinda K. Anderson, Hiroki Kurahashi and Beverly S. Emanuel Abstract Although balanced translocations are among the most common human chromosomal aberrations, the constitutional t(11;22)(q23;q11) is the only known recurrent non-Robertsonian translocation. Evidence indicates that de novo formation of the t(11;22) occurs during meiosis. To test the hypothesis that spatial proximity of chromosomes 11 and 22 in meiotic prophase oocytes and spermatocytes plays a role in the rearrangement, the positions of the 11q23 and 22q11 translocation breakpoints were examined. Fluorescence in situ hybridization with use of DNA probes for these sites demonstrates that 11q23 is closer to 22q11 in meiosis than to a control at 6q26. Although chromosome 21p11, another control, often lies as close to 11q23 as does 22q11 during meiosis, chromosome 21 rarely rearranges with 11q23, and the DNA sequence of chromosome 21 appears to be less susceptible than 22q11 to double-strand breaks (DSBs). It has been suggested that the rearrangement recurs as a result of the palindromic AT-rich repeats at both 11q23 and 22q11, which extrude hairpin structures that are susceptible to DSBs. To determine whether the DSBs at these sites coincide with normal hotspots of meiotic recombination, immunocytochemical mapping of MLH1, a protein involved in crossing over, was employed. The results indicate that the translocation breakpoints do not coincide with recombination hotspots and therefore are unlikely to be the result of meiotic programmed DSBs, although MRE11 is likely to be involved. Previous analysis indicated that the DSBs appear to be repaired by a mechanism similar to nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ), although NHEJ is normally suppressed during meiosis. Taken together, these studies support the hypothesis that physical proximity between 11q23 and 22q11—but not typical meiotic recombinational activity in meiotic prophase—plays an important role in the generation of the constitutional t(11;22) rearrangement. Abstract | | |
| AT-Rich Palindromes Mediate the Constitutional t(11;22) Translocation The American Journal of Human Genetics, Volume 68, Issue 1, 1 January 2001, Pages 1-13 L. Edelmann, E. Spiteri, K. Koren, V. Pulijaal, M.G. Bialer, A. Shanske, R. Goldberg and B.E. Morrow Abstract The constitutional t(11;22) translocation is the only known recurrent non-Robertsonian translocation in humans. Offspring are susceptible to der(22) syndrome, a severe congenital anomaly disorder caused by 3:1 meiotic nondisjunction events. We previously localized the t(11;22) translocation breakpoint to a region on 22q11 within a low-copy repeat termed “LCR22” and within an AT-rich repeat on 11q23. The LCR22s are implicated in mediating different rearrangements on 22q11, leading to velocardiofacial syndrome/DiGeorge syndrome and cat-eye syndrome by homologous recombination mechanisms. The LCR22s contain AT-rich repetitive sequences, suggesting that such repeats may mediate the t(11;22) translocation. To determine the molecular basis of the translocation, we cloned and sequenced the t(11;22) breakpoint in the derivative 11 and 22 chromosomes in 13 unrelated carriers, including two de novo cases and der(22) syndrome offspring. We found that, in all cases examined, the reciprocal exchange occurred between similar AT-rich repeats on both chromosomes 11q23 and 22q11. To understand the mechanism, we examined the sequence of the breakpoint intervals in the derivative chromosomes and compared this with the deduced normal chromosomal sequence. A palindromic AT-rich sequence with a near-perfect hairpin could form, by intrastrand base-pairing, on the parental chromosomes. The sequence of the breakpoint junction in both derivatives indicates that the exchange events occurred at the center of symmetry of the palindromes, and this resulted in small, overlapping staggered deletions in this region among the different carriers. On the basis of previous studies performed in diverse organisms, we hypothesize that double-strand breaks may occur in the center of the palindrome, the tip of the putative hairpin, leading to illegitimate recombination events between similar AT-rich sequences on chromosomes 11 and 22, resulting in deletions and loss of the palindrome, which then could stabilize the DNA structure. Abstract | | |