Copyright © 2005 The American Society of Human Genetics. All rights reserved.
The American Journal of Human Genetics, Volume 76, Issue 4, 592-608, 1 April 2005
doi:10.1086/429225
Michael P. Epstein1,
,
, Colin D. Veal3, Richard C. Trembath3, Jonathan N.W.N. Barker4, Chun Li5 and Glen A. Satten2
1 Department of Human Genetics, Emory University, Atlanta
2 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta
3 Division of Medical Genetics, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
4 St. John’s Institute of Dermatology, King’s College London, London
5 Center for Human Genetics Research, Vanderbilt University, Nashville
Address for correspondence and reprints: Dr. Michael P. Epstein, Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, 615 Michael Street, Suite 301, Atlanta, GA 30322Abstract
The selection of an appropriate control sample for use in association mapping requires serious deliberation. Unrelated controls are generally easy to collect, but the resulting analyses are susceptible to spurious association arising from population stratification. Parental controls are popular, since triads comprising a case and two parents can be used in analyses that are robust to this stratification. However, parental controls are often expensive and difficult to collect. In some situations, studies may have both parental and unrelated controls available for analysis. For example, a candidate-gene study may analyze triads but may have an additional sample of unrelated controls for examination of background linkage disequilibrium in genomic regions. Also, studies may collect a sample of triads to confirm results initially found using a traditional case-control study. Initial association studies also may collect each type of control, to provide insurance against the weaknesses of the other type. In these situations, resulting samples will consist of some triads, some unrelated controls, and, possibly, some unrelated cases. Rather than analyze the triads and unrelated subjects separately, we present a likelihood-based approach for combining their information in a single combined association analysis. Our approach allows for joint analysis of data from both triad and case-control study designs. Simulations indicate that our proposed approach is more powerful than association tests that are based on each separate sample. Our approach also allows for flexible modeling and estimation of allele effects, as well as for missing parental data. We illustrate the usefulness of our approach using SNP data from a candidate-gene study of psoriasis.
| A Generalization of the Transmission/Disequilibrium Test for Uncertain-Haplotype Transmission The American Journal of Human Genetics, Volume 65, Issue 4, 1 October 1999, Pages 1170-1177 David Clayton Abstract Summary:
A new transmission/disequilibrium-test statistic is proposed for situations in which transmission is uncertain. Such situations arise when transmission of a multilocus marker haplotype is considered, since haplotype phase is often unknown in a substantial number of instances. Even for single-locus markers, transmission is uncertain if one or both parents are missing. In both these situations, uncertainty may be reduced by the typing of further siblings, whose disease status may be unaffected or unknown. The proposed test is a score test based on a partial score function that omits the terms most influenced by hidden population stratification. Abstract | | |