Copyright © 2008 The American Society of Human Genetics. All rights reserved.
The American Journal of Human Genetics, Volume 82, Issue 3, 712-722, 3 March 2008
doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.01.011
Article
Anne W. Higgins1, Fowzan S. Alkuraya2, Amy F. Bosco3, Kerry K. Brown4, Gail A.P. Bruns5, Diana J. Donovan1, Robert Eisenman5, Yanli Fan2, Chantal G. Farra1, Heather L. Ferguson3, James F. Gusella4, 6, David J. Harris7, Steven R. Herrick1, Chantal Kelly3, Hyung-Goo Kim6, Shotaro Kishikawa6, Bruce R. Korf8, Shashikant Kulkarni9, Eric Lally1, Natalia T. Leach3, Emma Lemyre10, Janine Lewis6, Azra H. Ligon1, Weining Lu11, Richard L. Maas2, Marcy E. MacDonald6, 12, Steven D.P. Moore3, Roxanna E. Peters1, Bradley J. Quade1, Fabiola Quintero-Rivera6, Irfan Saadi2, Yiping Shen6, Jay Shendure4, Robin E. Williamson4, 13 and Cynthia C. Morton1, 3, 13,
, 
1 Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
2 Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
3 Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
4 Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
5 Genetics Division, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Boston and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
6 Molecular Neurogenetics Unit, Center for Human Genetic Research, Massachusetts General Hospital and Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
7 Division of Genetics, Children's Hospital Boston and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
8 Department of Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
9 Division of Laboratory and Genomic Medicine, Department of Pathology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
10 Medical Genetics Division, Hôpital Ste. Justine, University of Montreal, Montreal H3T 1C5, Canada
11 Renal Section, Department of Medicine, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, MA 02118, USA
12 Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
Corresponding authorAbstract
Apparently balanced chromosomal rearrangements in individuals with major congenital anomalies represent natural experiments of gene disruption and dysregulation. These individuals can be studied to identify novel genes critical in human development and to annotate further the function of known genes. Identification and characterization of these genes is the goal of the Developmental Genome Anatomy Project (DGAP). DGAP is a multidisciplinary effort that leverages the recent advances resulting from the Human Genome Project to increase our understanding of birth defects and the process of human development. Clinically significant phenotypes of individuals enrolled in DGAP are varied and, in most cases, involve multiple organ systems. Study of these individuals' chromosomal rearrangements has resulted in the mapping of 77 breakpoints from 40 chromosomal rearrangements by FISH with BACs and fosmids, array CGH, Southern-blot hybridization, MLPA, RT-PCR, and suppression PCR. Eighteen chromosomal breakpoints have been cloned and sequenced. Unsuspected genomic imbalances and cryptic rearrangements were detected, but less frequently than has been reported previously. Chromosomal rearrangements, both balanced and unbalanced, in individuals with multiple congenital anomalies continue to be a valuable resource for gene discovery and annotation.
| FISH Mapping of De Novo Apparently Balanced Chromosome Rearrangements Identifies Characteristics Associated with Phenotypic Abnormality The American Journal of Human Genetics, Volume 82, Issue 4, 11 April 2008, Pages 916-926 J.A. Fantes, E. Boland, J. Ramsay, D. Donnai, M. Splitt, J.A. Goodship, H. Stewart, M. Whiteford, P. Gautier, L. Harewood, S. Holloway, F. Sharkey, E. Maher, V. van Heyningen, J. Clayton-Smith, D.R. Fitzpatrick and G.C.M. Black Abstract We report fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) mapping of 152, mostly de novo, apparently balanced chromosomal rearrangement (ABCR) breakpoints in 76 individuals, 30 of whom had no obvious phenotypic abnormality (control group) and 46 of whom had an associated disease (case group). The aim of this study was to identify breakpoint characteristics that could discriminate between these groups and which might be of predictive value in de novo ABCR (DN-ABCR) cases detected antenatally. We found no difference in the proportion of breakpoints that interrupted a gene, although in three cases, direct interruption or deletion of known autosomal-dominant or X-linked recessive Mendelian disease genes was diagnostic. The only significant predictor of phenotypic abnormality in the group as a whole was the localization of one or both breakpoints to an R-positive (G-negative) band with estimated predictive values of 0.69 (95% CL 0.54–0.81) and 0.90 (95% CL 0.60–0.98), respectively. R-positive bands are known to contain more genes and have a higher guanine-cytosine (GC) content than do G-positive (R-negative) bands; however, whether a gene was interrupted by the breakpoint or the GC content in the 200kB around the breakpoint had no discriminant ability. Our results suggest that the large-scale genomic context of the breakpoint has prognostic utility and that the pathological mechanism of mapping to an R-band cannot be accounted for by direct gene inactivation. Abstract | | |
| Disruption of Neurexin 1 Associated with Autism Spectrum Disorder The American Journal of Human Genetics, Volume 82, Issue 1, 10 January 2008, Pages 199-207 Hyung-Goo Kim, Shotaro Kishikawa, Anne W. Higgins, Ihn-Sik Seong, Diana J. Donovan, Yiping Shen, Eric Lally, Lauren A. Weiss, Juliane Najm, Kerstin Kutsche, Maria Descartes, Lynn Holt, Stephen Braddock, Robin Troxell, Lee Kaplan, Fred Volkmar, Ami Klin, Katherine Tsatsanis, David J. Harris, Ilse Noens, David L. Pauls, Mark J. Daly, Marcy E. MacDonald, Cynthia C. Morton, Bradley J. Quade and James F. Gusella Abstract Autism is a neurodevelopmental disorder of complex etiology in which genetic factors play a major role. We have implicated the neurexin 1 (NRXN1) gene in two independent subjects who display an autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in association with a balanced chromosomal abnormality involving 2p16.3. In the first, with karyotype 46,XX,ins(16;2)(q22.1;p16.1p16.3)pat, NRXN1 is directly disrupted within intron 5. Importantly, the father possesses the same chromosomal abnormality in the absence of ASD, indicating that the interruption of α-NRXN1 is not fully penetrant and must interact with other factors to produce ASD. The breakpoint in the second subject, with 46,XY,t(1;2)(q31.3;p16.3)dn, occurs ∼750 kb 5′ to NRXN1 within a 2.6 Mb genomic segment that harbors no currently annotated genes. A scan of the NRXN1 coding sequence in a cohort of ASD subjects, relative to non-ASD controls, revealed that amino acid alterations in neurexin 1 are not present at high frequency in ASD. However, a number of rare sequence variants in the coding region, including two missense changes in conserved residues of the α-neurexin 1 leader sequence and of an epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like domain, respectively, suggest that even subtle changes in NRXN1 might contribute to susceptibility to ASD. Abstract | | |
| Constitutional Rearrangement of the Architectural Factor HMGA2: A Novel Human Phenotype Including Overgrowth and Lipomas The American Journal of Human Genetics, Volume 76, Issue 2, 1 February 2005, Pages 340-348 Azra H. Ligon, Steven D.P. Moore, Melissa A. Parisi, Matthew E. Mealiffe, David J. Harris, Heather L. Ferguson, Bradley J. Quade and Cynthia C. Morton Abstract Although somatic mutations in a number of genes have been associated with development of human tumors, such as lipomas, relatively few examples exist of germline mutations in these genes. Here we describe an 8-year-old boy who has a de novo pericentric inversion of chromosome 12, with breakpoints at p11.22 and q14.3, and a phenotype including extreme somatic overgrowth, advanced endochondral bone and dental ages, a cerebellar tumor, and multiple lipomas. His chromosomal inversion was found to truncate HMGA2, a gene that encodes an architectural factor involved in the etiology of many benign mesenchymal tumors and that maps to the 12q14.3 breakpoint. Similar truncations of murine Hmga2 in transgenic mice result in somatic overgrowth and, in particular, increased abundance of fat and lipomas, features strikingly similar to those observed in the child. This represents the first report of a constitutional rearrangement affecting HMGA2 and demonstrates the role of this gene in human growth and development. Systematic genetic analysis and clinical studies of this child may offer unique insights into the role of HMGA2 in adipogenesis, osteogenesis, and general growth control. Abstract | | |