Copyright © 2008 The American Society of Human Genetics. All rights reserved.
The American Journal of Human Genetics, Volume 82, Issue 4, 937-948, 20 March 2008
doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.02.008
Article
Antonis C. Antoniou1,
,
, Amanda B. Spurdle2, Olga M. Sinilnikova3, 4, Sue Healey2, Karen A. Pooley1, 5, Rita K. Schmutzler6, Beatrix Versmold6, Christoph Engel7, Alfons Meindl8, Norbert Arnold9, Wera Hofmann10, Christian Sutter11, Dieter Niederacher12, Helmut Deissler13, Trinidad Caldes14, Kati Kämpjärvi15, Heli Nevanlinna15, Jacques Simard16, Jonathan Beesley2, Xiaoqing Chen2, the Kathleen Cuningham Consortium for Research into Familial Breast Cancer17, Susan L. Neuhausen18, Timothy R. Rebbeck19, Theresa Wagner20, Henry T. Lynch21, Claudine Isaacs22, Jeffrey Weitzel23, Patricia A. Ganz24, Mary B. Daly25, Gail Tomlinson26, Olufunmilayo I. Olopade27, Joanne L. Blum28, Fergus J. Couch29, Paolo Peterlongo30, Siranoush Manoukian31, Monica Barile32, Paolo Radice30, Csilla I. Szabo33, Lutecia H. Mateus Pereira34, 65, Mark H. Greene35, Gad Rennert36, Flavio Lejbkowicz36, Ofra Barnett-Griness36, Irene L. Andrulis37, 38, 39, Hilmi Ozcelik38, 39, OCGN37, Anne-Marie Gerdes40, Maria A. Caligo41, Yael Laitman42, Bella Kaufman43, Roni Milgrom42, Eitan Friedman42, 43, The Swedish BRCA1 and BRCA2 study collaborators44, Susan M. Domchek45, Katherine L. Nathanson45, Ana Osorio46, Gemma Llort47, Roger L. Milne48, Javier Benítez46, 48, Ute Hamann49, Frans B.L. Hogervorst50, Peggy Manders51, Marjolijn J.L. Ligtenberg52, Ans M.W. van den Ouweland53, The DNA-HEBON collaborators44, Susan Peock1, Margaret Cook1, Radka Platte1, D. Gareth Evans54, Rosalind Eeles55, Gabriella Pichert56, Carol Chu57, Diana Eccles58, Rosemarie Davidson59, Fiona Douglas60, EMBRACE1, Andrew K. Godwin25, Laure Barjhoux3, 4, Sylvie Mazoyer4, Hagay Sobol61, Violaine Bourdon61, François Eisinger61, Agnès Chompret62, 66, Corinne Capoulade63, Brigitte Bressac-de Paillerets63, Gilbert M. Lenoir63, Marion Gauthier-Villars64, Claude Houdayer64, Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet64, GEMO, Georgia Chenevix-Trench2, Douglas F. Easton1, on behalf of CIMBA
1 Cancer Research UK, Genetic Epidemiology Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, UK
2 Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Australia
3 Unité Mixte de Génétique Constitutionnelle des Cancers Fréquents, Hospices Civils de Lyon/Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
4 Laboratoire de Génétique Moléculaire, Signalisation et Cancer, UMR5201 CNRS, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France
5 Cancer Research UK, Human Cancer Genetics Group, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, UK
6 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Molecular Gynaeco-Oncology, University of Cologne, Germany
7 Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig, Germany
8 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Technical University, Munich, Germany
9 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany
10 Institute of Human Genetics, Charite-University Medical Centre, Berlin, Germany
11 Institute of Human Genetics, University of Heidelberg, Germany
12 Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Düsseldorf, Germany
13 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Ulm, Germany
14 Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
15 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
16 Canada Research Chair in Oncogenetics, Cancer Genomics Laboratory, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Quebec and Laval University
17 Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, Melbourne, Australia
18 Department of Epidemiology, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
19 Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
20 University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
21 Creighton University, Omaha, NE, USA
22 Fisher Center for Familial Cancer Research, Lombardi Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
23 City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
24 UCLA Schools of Medicine & Public Health, and the UCLA Familial Cancer Registry of the Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
25 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
26 University of Texas, Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
27 University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
28 Baylor-Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
29 Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
30 Unit of Genetic Susceptibility to Cancer, Department of Experimental Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori and IFOM, Fondazione Istituto FIRC di Oncologia Molecolare, Milan, Italy
31 Medical Genetics Service, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
32 Division of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
33 Department of Laboratory Medicine and Experimental Pathology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA
34 Laboratory of Population Genetics, US National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA
35 Clinical Genetics Branch, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
36 CHS National Cancer Control Center and Department of Community Medicine and Epidemiology, Carmel Medical Center and B. Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Haifa, Israel
37 Ontario Cancer Genetics Network, Cancer Care Ontario, and Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
38 Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Canada
39 Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Canada
40 Department of Biochemistry, Pharmacology and Genetics, Odense University Hospital, Denmark
41 Division of Surgical, Molecular and Ultrastructural Pathology, Department of Oncology, University of Pisa and Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
42 The Susanne Levy Gertner Oncogenetics Unit, Sheba Medical center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
43 Oncology Institute, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
44 See Acknowledgments
45 Department of Medicine, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
46 Human Genetics Group, Human Cancer Genetics Programme, Spanish National Cancer Centre, Madrid, Spain
47 Genetic Counselling Unit, Prevention and Cancer Control Service, Institut Català d'Oncologia, Barcelona, Spain
48 Genotyping Unit, Human Cancer Genetics Programme, Spanish National Cancer Centre, Madrid, Spain
49 Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Germany
50 Family Cancer Clinic, Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
51 Department of Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
52 Department of Human Genetics and Department of Pathology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
53 Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
54 Academic Unit of Medical Genetics and Regional Genetics Service, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK
55 Translational Cancer Genetics Team, The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
56 Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
57 Yorkshire Regional Genetics Service, Leeds, UK
58 Wessex Clinical Genetics Service, Princess Anne Hospital, Southampton, UK
59 Ferguson-Smith Centre for Clinical Genetics, Glasgow, UK
60 Institute of Human Genetics, Centre for Life, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
61 INSERM UMR599, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Département d'Oncologie Génétique, Marseille 13275, France
62 Oncological Genetics, Department of Medicine, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
63 CNRS FRE2939, Department of Genetics, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
64 Institut Curie, Genetics Department, Université Paris-Descartes, France
Corresponding authorAbstract
Germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 confer high risks of breast cancer. However, evidence suggests that these risks are modified by other genetic or environmental factors that cluster in families. A recent genome-wide association study has shown that common alleles at single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in FGFR2 (rs2981582), TNRC9 (rs3803662), and MAP3K1 (rs889312) are associated with increased breast cancer risks in the general population. To investigate whether these loci are also associated with breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, we genotyped these SNPs in a sample of 10,358 mutation carriers from 23 studies. The minor alleles of SNP rs2981582 and rs889312 were each associated with increased breast cancer risk in BRCA2 mutation carriers (per-allele hazard ratio [HR] = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.20–1.45, ptrend = 1.7 × 10−8 and HR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.02–1.24, ptrend = 0.02) but not in BRCA1 carriers. rs3803662 was associated with increased breast cancer risk in both BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers (per-allele HR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.06–1.20, ptrend = 5 × 10−5 in BRCA1 and BRCA2 combined). These loci appear to interact multiplicatively on breast cancer risk in BRCA2 mutation carriers. The differences in the effects of the FGFR2 and MAP3K1 SNPs between BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers point to differences in the biology of BRCA1 and BRCA2 breast cancer tumors and confirm the distinct nature of breast cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers.
| De Novo Alu-Element Insertions in FGFR2 Identify a Distinct Pathological Basis for Apert Syndrome The American Journal of Human Genetics, Volume 64, Issue 2, 1 February 1999, Pages 446-461 Michael Oldridge, Elaine H. Zackai, Donna M. McDonald-McGinn, Sachiko Iseki, Gillian M. Morriss-Kay, Stephen R.F. Twigg, David Johnson, Steven A. Wall, Wen Jiang, Christiane Theda, Ethylin Wang Jabs and Andrew O.M. Wilkie Abstract Summary:
Apert syndrome, one of five craniosynostosis syndromes caused by allelic mutations of fibroblast growth-factor receptor 2 (FGFR2), is characterized by symmetrical bony syndactyly of the hands and feet. We have analyzed 260 unrelated patients, all but 2 of whom have missense mutations in exon 7, which affect a dipeptide in the linker region between the second and third immunoglobulin-like domains. Hence, the molecular mechanism of Apert syndrome is exquisitely specific. FGFR2 mutations in the remaining two patients are distinct in position and nature. Surprisingly, each patient harbors an Alu-element insertion of ∼360 bp, in one case just upstream of exon 9 and in the other case within exon 9 itself. The insertions are likely to be pathological, because they have arisen de novo; in both cases this occurred on the paternal chromosome. FGFR2 is present in alternatively spliced isoforms characterized by either the IIIb (exon 8) or IIIc (exon 9) domains (keratinocyte growth-factor receptor [KGFR] and bacterially expressed kinase, respectively), which are differentially expressed in mouse limbs on embryonic day 13. Splicing of exon 9 was examined in RNA extracted from fibroblasts and keratinocytes from one patient with an Alu insertion and two patients with Pfeiffer syndrome who had nucleotide substitutions of the exon 9 acceptor splice site. Ectopic expression of KGFR in the fibroblast lines correlated with the severity of limb abnormalities. This provides the first genetic evidence that signaling through KGFR causes syndactyly in Apert syndrome. Abstract | | |
| Genetic Heterogeneity of Saethre-Chotzen Syndrome, Due to TWIST and FGFR Mutations The American Journal of Human Genetics, Volume 62, Issue 6, 1 June 1998, Pages 1370-1380 William A. Paznekas, Michael L. Cunningham, Timothy D. Howard, Bruce R. Korf, Mark H. Lipson, Art W. Grix, Murray Feingold, Rosalie Goldberg, Zvi Borochowitz, Kirk Aleck, John Mulliken, Mingfei Yin and Ethylin Wang Jabs Abstract Summary:
Thirty-two unrelated patients with features of Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, a common autosomal dominant condition of craniosynostosis and limb anomalies, were screened for mutations in TWIST,FGFR2, and FGFR3. Nine novel and three recurrent TWIST mutations were found in 12 families. Seven families were found to have the FGFR3 P250R mutation, and one individual was found to have an FGFR2 VV269–270 deletion. To date, our detection rate for TWIST or FGFR mutations is 68% in our Saethre-Chotzen syndrome patients, including our five patients elsewhere reported with TWIST mutations. More than 35 different TWIST mutations are now known in the literature. The most common phenotypic features, present in more than a third of our patients with TWIST mutations, are coronal synostosis, brachycephaly, low frontal hairline, facial asymmetry, ptosis, hypertelorism, broad great toes, and clinodactyly. Significant intra- and interfamilial phenotypic variability is present for either TWIST mutations or FGFR mutations. The overlap in clinical features and the presence, in the same genes, of mutations for more than one craniosynostotic condition—such as Saethre-Chotzen, Crouzon, and Pfeiffer syndromes—support the hypothesis that TWIST and FGFRs are components of the same molecular pathway involved in the modulation of craniofacial and limb development in humans. Abstract | | |
| Genomic Screening of Fibroblast Growth-Factor Receptor 2 Reveals a Wide Spectrum of Mutations in Patients with Syndromic Craniosynostosis The American Journal of Human Genetics, Volume 70, Issue 2, 1 February 2002, Pages 472-486 Shih-hsin Kan, Navaratnam Elanko, David Johnson, Laura Cornejo-Roldan, Jackie Cook, Elsa W. Reich, Susan Tomkins, Alain Verloes, Stephen R.F. Twigg, Sahan Rannan-Eliya, Donna M. McDonald-McGinn, Elaine H. Zackai, Steven A. Wall, Maximilian Muenke and Andrew O.M. Wilkie Abstract It has been known for several years that heterozygous mutations of three members of the fibroblast growth-factor–receptor family of signal-transduction molecules—namely, FGFR1, FGFR2, and FGFR3—contribute significantly to disorders of bone patterning and growth. FGFR3 mutations, which predominantly cause short-limbed bone dysplasia, occur in all three major regions (i.e., extracellular, transmembrane, and intracellular) of the protein. By contrast, most mutations described in FGFR2 localize to just two exons (IIIa and IIIc), encoding the IgIII domain in the extracellular region, resulting in syndromic craniosynostosis including Apert, Crouzon, or Pfeiffer syndromes. Interpretation of this apparent clustering of mutations in FGFR2 has been hampered by the absence of any complete FGFR2-mutation screen. We have now undertaken such a screen in 259 patients with craniosynostosis in whom mutations in other genes (e.g., FGFR1, FGFR3, and TWIST) had been excluded; part of this screen was a cohort-based study, enabling unbiased estimates of the mutation distribution to be obtained. Although the majority (61/62 in the cohort sample) of FGFR2 mutations localized to the IIIa and IIIc exons, we identified mutations in seven additional exons—including six distinct mutations of the tyrosine kinase region and a single mutation of the IgII domain. The majority of patients with atypical mutations had diagnoses of Pfeiffer syndrome or Crouzon syndrome. Overall, FGFR2 mutations were present in 9.8% of patients with craniosynostosis who were included in a prospectively ascertained sample, but no mutations were found in association with isolated fusion of the metopic or sagittal sutures. We conclude that the spectrum of FGFR2 mutations causing craniosynostosis is wider than previously recognized but that, nevertheless, the IgIIIa/IIIc region represents a genuine mutation hotspot. Abstract | | |